<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://thelegaldesk.com/2026/05/28/admissibility-of-further-evidence-on-appeal/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>The Legal Desk</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-05-28T06:30:00+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Admissibility of Further Evidence on Appeal: B v The State</news:title><news:keywords>South African criminal law, Supreme Court of Appeal, substantial and compelling circumstances, minimum sentence legislation, hearsay evidence in sentencing, rape sentencing, sexual offences law, criminal appeals South Africa, HIV status evidence, constitutional rights in criminal law</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://thelegaldesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/further-evidence-on-appeal.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
